A new rule on nature must be adopted that no one should impair, impede, hamper or obstruct the flow of nature and that people should help %26amp; make nature work naturally, properly and rightfully because the environment should not suffer its natural world from faults like the carbon emission reduction (a theory of falsity) and the recommended actions such as large-scale composting, biomass for energy, sanitary landfill, etc.(which do not work in harmony with nature) to interfere with its own to the detriment of people %26amp; other living things. In the conflict of scientific laws, it must be often a matter of doubt which should prevail and that, whenever that doubt exists, the people should still be given the benefit to life first, compatible to natural %26amp; universal laws. Otherwise the immediate problems would remain exactly the same to worse as foreseeable adverse consequences, raised by the author Winston Kayanan from the Philippines in his earlier message in “Prosecuting God’s Case vs. UN”.
With the massive used of carbon both from extracted coal %26amp; oil as fuels (which basically come from plant kingdom), the author believes that it can best be retrieved by recapturing the same volume (or even more) in a solid form (instead of gases). This will defeat the performance of world’s remedies like carbon trading, plant forest scheme, etc., in reducing freed %26amp; trapped waste gases in the atmosphere (which have been destructively affecting the environment)
For this purpose, the author alleges that, by employing a large-scale organic matter cycling, it would serve as a successful way of extricating the world from its predicament of global warming %26amp; climate change. The Philippine invented technology was made to perform great wonders in dramatically repairing %26amp; rejuvenating (than sustaining) almost all under the environment by principally allowing carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, and water cycle perform simultaneously %26amp; work effectively. In fact, in a short presentation sometime July 2004 to the visiting representatives of APEC-VC Australia at the Environment Division of the Dept. of Science %26amp; Technology in the Philippines, they commented it as “very ambitious”.
By examining carbon emissions, burnt carbon from transportation %26amp; industries ranks only 5th among the sources of CO2 emitters aside from what are widely known like plants, animals and man. UN, however, failed to count the largest CO2 emitters (unseen by the naked eye) and that is the (decay) microorganisms. They are actually the No. 1 CO2 contributor of waste gas pollution in the atmosphere which UN %26amp; its scientists overlooked. Unknowingly, these microorganisms cause massive CO2 emissions in quadrillion MT per hectare a day, engendering global warming and its repercussion, climate change, having heat waves, droughts, landslides, giant waves, quakes, volcanic eruptions and so forth. In this vein, the world followed UN for having no clues or incomplete understanding of the natural world and hence, people were indeed misled to the right path.
Loss of confidence in the scientific community is beginning. In fact, Ban’s spokeswoman Michele Montas mistakenly told AFP: “The solutions are not going to come from the scientists but rather the solutions are going to come from the people who deal with these issues on a daily basis,” (BT Environment Section dated 07-28-09). For such blooper, it has indirectly eroded the integrity of UN (as well as the credibility of the scientific community). This had fortified the author’s earlier allegations to some 30 countries (via letter in 2007) and lately to the subscribers (via yahoo’s question %26amp; answer in May 2009) that UN is bleeding internally, meaning that they are contradicting %26amp; opposing each other views. The fact that the former Sec. Gen. Kopi Annan announced in public (sometime 2005) “to prepare for natural disasters”, this was already an indirect acknowledgement of surrender %26amp; defeat. And people had already lost hope with its latest announcement “to mitigate %26amp; adapt measures”.
We are living thru a leadership %26amp; management crisis. And people are undergoing psychological ordeals of anxiety %26amp; fear everyday. The order of life %26amp; nature is reversed with no more hope of cure or relief but self-destruction awaits everyone. People are robbed of freedom, health and peace. UN Sec. Gen. Ban Ki-moon must weigh the pros %26amp; cons of reality because people must primordially enjoy life with liberty. He must search for a new answer, i.e., something morally convincing, certain %26amp; assuring that will work, strongly curative to the environment, economically productive and widely accepted. But it seems he will not, being static %26amp; unchangeable. He only duplicated the faults %26amp; failures of the previous administration even if it may not be intentionally committed. In fact, the younger generation of innocent South Koreans is behind him in the promotion of UN’s programs.
The continuous process of development of ideas has been stopped. And the
WHAT ACTION SHOULD THE WORLD TAKE?
A good first step would be to not listen to idiots who just cut and paste questions and miss quote the bible for their own pointless ends. And the
WHAT ACTION SHOULD THE WORLD TAKE?
is this where you copied the piece from?
http://www.realityjumper.co.uk/faq.html
or was it here?
http://www.playdiscgolf.com/faq.html?tag…
it's pretty obvious that you didn't write it.
oh my, i see you plagiarize one every day.
that's what it's called when you post someone else's work as if it was your own.
More government! More rules! More blind obedience! That's the answer!
Reduce co2 emissions
I think we should begin by encouraging the use of intelligible language. And the
THE RIGHT ACTION IS: U PEOPLE FROM USA MUST GIVE TO ME A JOB AS A FOREST ENGINEER IM FROM BRAZIL AND I TAKE CARE THE FORESTS AND THE ONE IS THE LIFE OF THE WORLD
I believe that we need to learn more about how to colonize space.
Wow. Never has so much said so little.
bla bla bla. There are plenty of sources (reliable) to find out about global warming/cooling, which are as you must know cyclical events that have been happening every 1000,000 years or so since the beginning. The planet is very much alive and changing all the time. We humans never know what lies ahead (earthquakes for instance) but there is enough evidence to show us that even if we stopped all pollution tomorrow (not a bad idea) global warming/cooling would still occur. Nature rules.
waow a lot of information ;but i say that the united nation should creat a form of international or gobal control government with build in council from each country and create international energy research or of scientific research. Either to create private and non private companies to make the move also the affect of over population is another factor so nasa need to move faster so we can populate other planet sounds crazy but true and also to kall end for des forestation we are going to end without a onzone layer to protect us ... this more of suggestion than an anwers but has answer to help the plant live naturally also should use planets energy those that cant not be inhabited .
